The 2-Minute Rule for h4831sc load data
The 2-Minute Rule for h4831sc load data
Blog Article
What is Every person acquiring great precision with for 180gr products and 4831? Just on the lookout for a place to begin so I do not squander a lot of parts. Many thanks for the help!
Naturally, the Hodgdon tech wouldn't endorse my mixing of different ton numbers, but I believe I understand why. It is a litigation-pushed globe, and many fool would surely deduce that he could blend H380 and H110 and come up with his possess custom combination of powder. What a earth.
Can they be interchanged without worries other then utilizing normal load techniques when switching from great deal to large amount?
Minnesota H4831SC is my check out inside the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am preserving the tiny I have remaining for fall 2021. I might start low and do the job your way up, determined by what load data you have a look at for this combo the min/max loads are all around the board.
INgunner54 mentioned: It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Observed a node and shot some groups.
It's probably that no further dialogue is required, in which circumstance we propose commencing a new thread. If having said that you are feeling your reaction is required you may nonetheless accomplish that.
Nampa, Idaho In my knowledge the sole actual variance is that the shortcut meters far better via reloading products. Once It is really loaded theres no purposeful difference. I have listened to the shortcut may have a little bit more rapidly burn off fee but it seems insignificant.
Im under the knowledge I need to use h4831sc. I've read through that these h4831sc powders are equivalent Other than the shorter grain sizing of the sc. Must I nevertheless be on the lookout for h4381sc?
dioni.a.312 claimed: In my experience the only authentic variance is that the shortcut meters superior via reloading devices. The moment It really is loaded theres no useful h4831sc difference. I've heard which the shortcut can have a small little bit more quickly burn fee but It appears insignificant. Click on to increase...
The 55grs is everything I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I think that they have slowed down the swift to show that their rifles are improved. It bug the hell away from me. I do know improved. This is why I do not at any time throw out my more mature manuals. I do invest in new handbook constantly to remain up on new chambers and there loading. I exploit this 39grs in summers @ 100+ degrees with none troubles.
That is an more mature thread, you might not receive a response, and could be reviving an aged thread. Remember to think about making a new thread.
Soon after reading through this text (and lots of Other individuals, but this one is considered the most data driven with multiple accredited shooters) I have stopped worrying about touching or being in just a magical length through the lands, and commenced loading where by I could h4831sc load data optimize a number of facets of a load. Just my .02, hopefully you can get something to work for ya.
arkansas or ohio i never ever recognized a difference besides the frequent is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan.
I sawed a single in 50 percent to check out how thick the jackets were being, and they ended up conveniently twice as thick as being a 50-grain hollow stage was. Ditto for your 64-grain Electricity Place, as these bullets are constructed for deer, not prairie puppies or woodchucks. You now know almost everything I understand about the 22-250 and slow-burning powders, and I don't know just about anything in any way about the 223. I question that you are going to get wherever with that cartridge and 4831, but allow us to know how it goes.